imagine you have a friend who just finished reading the book "Johnny Chan" by Mitch Raycroft and really enjoyed it. Would "The Wager" by David Grann be a good recommendation for him?

Yes — probably a good recommendation — but it depends on what your friend liked about "Johnny Chan." Why it would be a good match Both books (assuming Mitch Raycroft’s "Johnny Chan" is the narrative/biography of a high-stakes poker figure) share key features that many readers enjoy: gripping true stories, intense human drama, and close looks at people operating under extreme pressure and risk. David Grann’s "The Wager" is a tightly reported narrative nonfiction about a British shipwreck, survival, mutiny, and legal aftermath in the 18th century. It’s suspenseful, character-driven, and investigates human choices in life-or-death situations — similar emotional territory to poker stories about risk, bluffing, and moral choices under pressure. Where they differ Subject and setting: "Johnny Chan" centers on contemporary gambling/poker culture; "The Wager" is maritime history from the Age of Sail. If your friend loved the Vegas/poker world specifically, the switch to shipwreck history might feel jarring. Tone and method: Grann’s book is deeply archival and investigatory — a reconstruction from logs, letters, and court records — with a literary nonfiction style. If your friend prefers memoir-style first-person anecdotes, "The Wager" is more reporterly and reconstructive. Content: "The Wager" includes harrowing survival scenes and morally fraught episodes (mutiny, violence, desperate decisions). It’s more graphic and grim in places than a poker biography likely is. Recommendations based on what they liked If they enjoyed the true-story tension, moral ambiguity, and character study in "Johnny Chan": definitely recommend "The Wager." They’ll appreciate Grann’s narrative craft and the way he teases out reliability and motive. If they loved the poker culture, strategy, and modern setting: consider alternatives more closely tied to gambling/poker, such as "The Biggest Game in Town" by Al Alvarez or "Positively Fifth Street" by James McManus. Or for more contemporary memoir-style poker reads, look for player autobiographies or behind-the-scenes accounts. Would you like a short blurb you can send your friend (one-sentence pitch), or a few alternate book suggestions tailored to whether they preferred the poker or the narrative-nonfiction aspects?

What is 81kg in stone and lb?

The correct answer is: $81\text{ kg}=12\text{ st }10.6\text{ lb}\ (\approx178.57\text{ lb})$ Explanation Convert kilograms to pounds, then convert pounds to stones (1 stone = 14 lb). Steps: Convert to pounds: $$178.5744323658\text{ lb}=81\times2.2046226218\text{ lb}$$ Find whole stones: $$\text{stones}=\left\lfloor\frac{178.5744323658}{14}\right\rfloor=12$$ Pounds remaining: $$\text{pounds remaining}=178.5744323658-12\times14=10.5744323658\text{ lb}\approx10.6\text{ lb}$$ Therefore, 81 kg ≈ 12 st 10.6 lb (which is about 178.57 lb). (If you prefer ounces: 10.5744 lb ≈ 10 lb 9.2 oz, so 12 st 10 lb 9.2 oz.)

What is 83 kg in pounds and stones?

The correct answer is: $83\text{ kg}\approx182.98\text{ lb}\approx13\text{ st }0.98\text{ lb}$ Explanation We convert kilograms to pounds using $1\text{ kg}=2.20462262185\text{ lb}$, then convert pounds to stones using $1\text{ st}=14\text{ lb}$. Steps: Convert kg → lb: $83\text{ kg}\times2.20462262185\frac{\text{lb}}{\text{kg}}=182.98367761355\text{ lb}\approx182.98\text{ lb}$ Convert lb → st + lb: Total stones $= \dfrac{182.98367761355\text{ lb}}{14\text{ lb/st}}=13.07026268668\text{ st}$ Integer stones $=13\text{ st}$, remainder in pounds $=182.98367761355-13\times14=0.98367761355\text{ lb}\approx0.98\text{ lb}$ Therefore, 83 kg ≈ 182.98 lb, which is 13 st 0.98 lb (you can round the pound remainder to 1 lb and say 13 st 1 lb).

If someone enjoyed a biography about Phil Ivey, would 'The Wager' by David Grann be a good book recommendation for them?

Short answer: Yes — but only if they liked the human drama, risk and narrative-nonfiction style of a Phil Ivey biography rather than the poker specifics. Explanation What they share: Both a Phil Ivey biography and David Grann’s The Wager deliver tightly written, character-driven true stories about people tested by extreme circumstances. If the reader enjoyed the psychological tension, high-stakes decision-making, moral ambiguity, and the immersive, investigative storytelling in a poker bio, they'll likely appreciate The Wager’s examination of leadership, luck versus judgment, survival, and the fallout of catastrophic choices. What’s different: The Wager is not about gambling, casinos, or modern competitive subcultures. It’s a historical narrative (an 18th‑century British warship, shipwreck, mutiny, survival, and the ensuing court-martial) rather than a contemporary sports/celebrity biography. Expect maritime history, archival research, and a very different setting and cast of characters. Style and tone: David Grann writes in a layered, investigative narrative style (similar to his other works like Killers of the Flower Moon). The Wager is suspenseful and moralistic, with rich detail and forensic reporting rather than tactical or technical breakdowns of games or careers. Who should (or shouldn’t) read it Good pick if they: enjoyed the drama of risk, the psychology of high-stakes choices, and well-researched narrative nonfiction. Not a great pick if they: specifically wanted more about poker strategy, the modern gambling world, or a celebrity-profile vibe focused on a contemporary figure’s career and lifestyle. Alternatives If they want more gambling/poker-related reads: James McManus — Positively Fifth Street; Molly Bloom — Molly’s Game; Al Alvarez — The Biggest Game in Town. If they liked Grann’s style: Killers of the Flower Moon (David Grann) or The Lost City of Z (David Grann/other narrative nonfiction) for similar investigative storytelling. Final suggestion: If they loved the storytelling and moral tension of the Phil Ivey bio, recommend The Wager — but mention the historical maritime setting so they know what to expect.

Which phrase has a more negative connotation? a concise response or a terse response

The phrase "terse response" has a more negative connotation. Explanation Concise describes speech or writing that is brief but complete and well-chosen — it implies clarity, efficiency, and thoughtfulness. Terse also means brief, but often carries the implication of brusqueness, curt rudeness, or lack of warmth; it suggests the speaker may be annoyed or unfriendly. Examples Concise: "She gave a concise summary of the experiment." (positive/neutral) Terse: "He gave a terse reply and walked away." (negative—implies abruptness) Notes Context and tone matter: a terse message can be neutral in very formal, time-critical situations, but most readers interpret it as colder or curt. Synonyms: concise = succinct, economical; terse = curt, brusque, abrupt. So, if you want to praise brevity, use concise; if you describe brevity that feels unfriendly, terse is the usual choice.

Home /
solutions /
Literature /
What is 47 in stones and lbs?

Question

What is 47 in stones and lbs?

Q: What is 47 in stones and lbs?

Do you mean 47 kilograms (kg) or 47 pounds (lb)? If you mean 47 kilograms: 47 kg = $47\times2.20462262=103.617263\text{ lb}$ Stones: $\lfloor103.617263/14\rfloor=7$ stones, remainder $103.617263-7\times14=5.617263\text{ lb}$ So 47 kg ≈ 7 st 5.6 lb (about 7 st 6 lb if rounded to the nearest pound). If you mean 47 pounds: $47\div14=3$ remainder $5$ So 47 lb = 3 st 5 lb. Which one did you mean, and do you want pounds rounded?

Answer

100% (3 rated)

Do you mean 47 kilograms (kg) or 47 pounds (lb)?

If you mean 47 kilograms:

47 kg = $47\times2.20462262=103.617263\text{ lb}$
Stones: $\lfloor103.617263/14\rfloor=7$ stones, remainder $103.617263-7\times14=5.617263\text{ lb}$
So 47 kg ≈ 7 st 5.6 lb (about 7 st 6 lb if rounded to the nearest pound).

If you mean 47 pounds:

$47\div14=3$ remainder $5$
So 47 lb = 3 st 5 lb.

Which one did you mean, and do you want pounds rounded?

How many tablespoons are equivalent to 3 ounces?

How many pounds is 62 kg?

Convert 165 pounds into kilograms.

What is 300 milliliters in fluid ounces?

A person’s weight is 154 pounds. Convert this to kilograms.

What is 103 kg in lbs?

Convert 3600 seconds to minutes.

What is 65 degrees Fahrenheit in Celsius?