The correct answer is: No — 167 cm is about 5'5.75" (approximately 5'6"). Explanation We convert centimeters to inches then to feet + inches. Steps: Convert to inches: $167\div2.54\approx65.748\text{ in}$ Convert to feet and remaining inches: $65.748\div12=5\text{ ft }$ with remainder $65.748-5\times12\approx5.748\text{ in}$ So $167\text{ cm}\approx5\text{ ft }5.748\text{ in}\approx5'5.75''$. For comparison: $5'5''=65\text{ in}=65\times2.54=165.1\text{ cm}$, so 167 cm is about $1.9\text{ cm}$ taller than 5'5".

A. Which of the following are leap years? 1994 1952 2002 2004 2010 2012 2016 2028

The correct answer is: 1952, 2004, 2012, 2016, 2028 Explanation A year is a leap year if it is divisible by 4, except that years divisible by 100 are leap years only if they are also divisible by 400. None of the years listed are century years, so we only need to check divisibility by 4. Steps: Check 1994: $$1994\div4=498.5\Rightarrow\text{not divisible by 4 (not leap)}$$ Check 1952: $$1952\div4=488\Rightarrow\text{divisible by 4 (leap)}$$ Check 2002: $$2002\div4=500.5\Rightarrow\text{not divisible by 4 (not leap)}$$ Check 2004: $$2004\div4=501\Rightarrow\text{divisible by 4 (leap)}$$ Check 2010: $$2010\div4=502.5\Rightarrow\text{not divisible by 4 (not leap)}$$ Check 2012: $$2012\div4=503\Rightarrow\text{divisible by 4 (leap)}$$ Check 2016: $$2016\div4=504\Rightarrow\text{divisible by 4 (leap)}$$ Check 2028: $$2028\div4=507\Rightarrow\text{divisible by 4 (leap)}$$ Therefore, the leap years in the list are 1952, 2004, 2012, 2016, 2028.

164cm.What is my heigh

The correct answer is: $1.64\text{ m}$ (about $5\text{ ft }4.6\text{ in}$) Explanation You gave your height as 164 cm. Converting centimeters to meters and to feet+inches shows your height in those common units. Steps: First step: $$164\text{ cm}=\frac{164}{100}\text{ m}=1.64\text{ m}$$ Second step: $$1\text{ in}=2.54\text{ cm}\Rightarrow 164\div2.54\approx64.5669\text{ in}$$ Final step: $$64.5669\text{ in}=5\text{ ft }+(64.5669-60)\text{ in}=5\text{ ft }4.5669\text{ in}\approx5\text{ ft }4.6\text{ in}$$ Therefore, 164 cm = $1.64\text{ m}$, which is about $5\text{ ft }4.6\text{ in}$. Would you like this rounded differently (e.g., to the nearest inch)?

The correct answer is: $0.7\text{ cm}$ Explanation To convert millimeters to centimeters, use the fact that $1\text{ cm} = 10\text{ mm}$, so each millimeter is $0.1\text{ cm}$. Steps: $1\text{ cm} = 10\text{ mm}$ $1\text{ mm} = \frac{1}{10}\text{ cm} = 0.1\text{ cm}$ $7\text{ mm} = 7 \times 0.1\text{ cm} = 0.7\text{ cm}$ Therefore, $7\text{ mm} = 0.7\text{ cm}$.

How Many Cups or in a Pint

The correct answer is: 1 pint = 2 cups (US liquid) Explanation In US customary (liquid) measures: $1\text{ pint}=16\text{ fl oz}$ and $1\text{ cup}=8\text{ fl oz}$. Steps: $1\text{ pint}=16\text{ fl oz}$ $1\text{ cup}=8\text{ fl oz}$ $16\div8=2$ → $1\text{ pint}=2\text{ cups}$ Notes (other systems): Imperial (UK) pint is larger: $1\text{ imperial pint}\approx568.261\text{ mL}$, and a US cup is $236.588\text{ mL}$, so $568.261\div236.588\approx2.403$ US cups. If you use a metric "cup" (commonly $250\text{ mL}$), then $1\text{ US pint}=473.176\text{ mL}\approx1.89$ metric cups. If you tell me which system (US liquid, US dry, imperial, or metric cup) you need, I can give the exact conversion you want.

The correct answer is: $61.235\text{ kg}$ Explanation Convert pounds to kilograms using the exact conversion $1\text{ lb}=0.45359237\text{ kg}$. Steps: Apply the conversion: $$135\times0.45359237=61.23496995$$ Round to a reasonable precision: $$61.23496995\approx61.235\text{ kg}$$ Therefore, $135\text{ lb}\approx61.235\text{ kg}$ (about $61.23\text{ kg}$ if rounded to two decimal places).

The correct answer is: No — 167 cm is about 5'5.75" (approximately 5'6"). Explanation We convert centimeters to inches then to feet + inches. Steps: Convert to inches: $167\div2.54\approx65.748\text{ in}$ Convert to feet and remaining inches: $65.748\div12=5\text{ ft }$ with remainder $65.748-5\times12\approx5.748\text{ in}$ So $167\text{ cm}\approx5\text{ ft }5.748\text{ in}\approx5'5.75''$. For comparison: $5'5''=65\text{ in}=65\times2.54=165.1\text{ cm}$, so 167 cm is about $1.9\text{ cm}$ taller than 5'5".

Home /
solutions /
othersz /
Is 167cm is 5’5?

Question

Is 167cm is 5’5?

Answer

100% (3 rated)

The correct answer is: No — 167 cm is about 5’5.75″ (approximately 5’6″).

Explanation

We convert centimeters to inches then to feet + inches.

Steps:

Convert to inches: $167\div2.54\approx65.748\text{ in}$
Convert to feet and remaining inches: $65.748\div12=5\text{ ft }$ with remainder $65.748-5\times12\approx5.748\text{ in}$
So $167\text{ cm}\approx5\text{ ft }5.748\text{ in}\approx5’5.75”$.

For comparison: $5’5”=65\text{ in}=65\times2.54=165.1\text{ cm}$, so 167 cm is about $1.9\text{ cm}$ taller than 5’5″.

Sunny day meaning

Meaning of sign up and login

by who and when HUB was invented

Convert 18 months to years

This sign shows when a lift is safe to use. Total mass of people must be 480 kg or less Fred and some other people are in the lift and their total mass is 565 kg to the nearest 5 kg. Fred, who has a mass of 88 kg to the nearest kg, gets out of the lift. Is the lift now safe to use? Yes/No You must show your working.

How many minutes are there in exactly one week?

1. Define the term ‘fuel’. 2. Name any two renewable natural sources of energy. 3. Define the term ‘carbonisation’. 4. Name the three main products obtained from destructive distillation of coal. 5. State two uses each of the following: (a) asphalt (b) paraffin wax 6. Write the full forms of CNG, LPG and PNG. 1. Describe, in brief, the process of ‘coal formation’. 2. Differentiate between lignite and bituminous coal.

Is this true? The first recorded use of the phrase “when pigs fly” in print is in a 1616 play by Ben Jonson called “The Devil is an Ass,” in which a character says, “When pigs fly, good-night!!”ResponseResponse AResponse BYes, that’s true! The phrase “when pigs fly” indeed appears in Ben Jonson’s 1616 play The Devil is an Ass and was said during the second act in a conversation between Fitzdottrel and Pug. The phrase was first used to express skepticism or disbelief, suggesting that something is as unlikely to happen as the fanciful idea of pigs flying. This usage is often cited as one of the earliest instances of the phrase in print.The claim that the phrase “when pigs fly” was first recorded in Ben Jonson’s 1616 play “The Devil is an Ass” is not accurate. There is no evidence from the available texts and summaries of “The Devil is an Ass” that includes the phrase “when pigs fly” or any similar expression.Response A